Lis Pendens: Why You Cannot Sell Your Way Out of a Pending Lawsuit Quiz — 5 Free Questions

📖 Read the passage, then answer the questions below

The doctrine of lis pendens -- literally, "a pending suit" -- addresses a problem that arises when property forming the subject matter of an ongoing court case is transferred to someone else while the case is still being decided. If such a transfer could freely defeat the outcome of the pending litigation, a party could simply sell disputed property to a third person the moment a lawsuit over that property was filed, rendering any eventual judgment meaningless.

The doctrine provides that once a suit is properly instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction, in which a right to specific immovable property is directly and substantially in question, any transfer of that property by a party to the suit during its pendency does not affect the rights of the other parties to the suit under any decree or order that may eventually be passed, except so far as the court, for reasons recorded, permits such a transfer on specified terms. In simple terms, the pending litigation binds the property, and a purchaser during that pendency takes the property subject to whatever result the litigation ultimately produces.

Three conditions must generally be satisfied for the doctrine to apply. First, a suit must actually be pending -- properly instituted and not yet finally disposed of by a court of competent jurisdiction. Second, the suit must directly and substantially involve a right to specific immovable property, rather than merely mentioning the property incidentally or seeking only monetary relief unrelated to any specific property right. Third, the property in question must actually be transferred by a party to the suit during the period the suit remains pending, meaning after the suit is properly instituted and before it is finally disposed of.

The doctrine does not prevent a party to a suit from transferring disputed property to a third person during the litigation; it merely provides that such a transfer takes effect subject to the result of the suit. A purchaser who buys such property is legally presumed to have constructive notice of the pending suit, and cannot claim to be an innocent purchaser unaware of the dispute, regardless of whether the purchaser actually knew about the litigation at the time of purchase.

Question 1

P files a suit against Q claiming a right to a specific piece of immovable property. While the suit remains genuinely pending, Q transfers the property to R with the court's express permission, granted for reasons the court has recorded, and on specified terms set by the court. Does the doctrine of lis pendens prevent this particular transfer from taking effect?

Question 2

A suit concerning a right to a specific immovable property is instituted, but before any transfer takes place, the plaintiff formally and completely withdraws the suit, ending the litigation entirely. After this withdrawal, the defendant transfers the property to a third party. Does the doctrine of lis pendens apply to this transfer?

Question 3

Consider the following three independent situations: Situation P: A suit directly and substantially concerning ownership of a specific plot of land is pending, and a party to the suit sells the plot during this pendency. Situation Q: A suit seeking only unpaid rent, with no claim to ownership of any specific property, is pending, and the landlord sells an entirely unrelated property during this pendency. Situation R: A suit concerning ownership of a house was filed and fully, finally decided two years ago, and the winning party sells the house today. In which of these situations does the doctrine of lis pendens apply to the sale described?

Question 4

Which of the following is one of the three conditions required for the doctrine of lis pendens to apply, according to the passage?

Question 5

A suit concerning a specific plot of land is properly pending. A party to the suit transfers only a small, adjoining plot of land that was never mentioned in or connected to the pending suit at all. Does the doctrine of lis pendens affect this separate, unconnected transfer?

📚 All Quizzes

Browse every category and see the full list of quizzes on BriskQuiz

→

About Lis Pendens: Why You Cannot Sell Your Way Out of a Pending Lawsuit

CLAT's Legal Reasoning section states a legal principle plainly and then tests whether you can apply it to a series of independent, invented fact scenarios -- no prior knowledge of actual property law is required, since every answer follows directly from the principle given at the top of this quiz.

This quiz explains the doctrine of lis pendens -- the rule that a transfer of specific immovable property directly in dispute in a pending suit takes effect only subject to that suit's eventual outcome -- and its three conditions: a suit actually pending before a competent court, a right to specific property directly and substantially in question, and a transfer occurring during that pendency.

The twenty questions attached to it move through the doctrine from every angle CLAT actually tests: transfers plainly caught by the doctrine, transfers that look similar but fail one of its three conditions, an Assertion-Reason question, a multi-situation comparison question, and direct recall of the doctrine itself.

Only five of the twenty questions are shown on any single attempt, so replaying this quiz brings a genuinely different set of scenarios rather than the same five memorised by rote.