Critical Reasoning: Evaluating an Urban Tree-Planting Proposal Quiz — 5 Free Questions

📖 Read the passage, then answer the questions below

A city's parks department is considering a proposal to plant fast-growing shade trees along every residential street in the city's hottest neighbourhoods, which currently have little tree cover. Proponents argue that shade from mature trees can lower street-level temperatures by several degrees during summer heat waves, that tree-lined streets encourage more residents to walk instead of drive for short trips, and that trees planted now will provide substantial shade within about eight years.

Based on a two-year pilot planting in one neighbourhood, the parks department has concluded that expanding the tree-planting program citywide would meaningfully reduce summer street-level temperatures in the hottest neighbourhoods and lower related heat-illness emergency room visits, without requiring an increase in the department's long-term maintenance budget.

Question 1

Which of the following is an assumption underlying the claim that the maintenance budget would not increase?

Question 2

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the parks department's conclusion?

Question 3

Based on the passage, proponents believe expanded tree planting is advantageous primarily because of which combination of factors?

Question 4

Which of the following best describes the relationship between the pilot and the parks department's conclusion?

Question 5

Which of the following most accurately describes a weakness in the parks department's reasoning?

📚 All Quizzes

Browse every category and see the full list of quizzes on BriskQuiz

→

About Critical Reasoning: Evaluating an Urban Tree-Planting Proposal

CLAT's Logical Reasoning section tests critical reasoning directly: a short passage lays out an argument, and the questions that follow test whether you can identify its conclusion, its assumptions, and what would strengthen or weaken it -- no prior knowledge of the topic is needed, since every answer follows from the passage itself.

This quiz works through a single original argument about a city parks department's proposal, examining every angle CLAT actually tests: the argument's main conclusion, the assumptions it depends on, evidence that would strengthen or weaken specific claims within it, what can be validly inferred, and a weakness in its reasoning.

The twenty questions include an Assertion-Reason question and a multi-statement combination question alongside the dominant strengthen, weaken, and assumption format, keeping the same variety CLAT itself uses across a single passage.

Only five of the twenty questions are shown on any single attempt, so replaying this quiz brings a genuinely different set of questions rather than the same five memorised by rote.